Abstract
In this article I briefly survey the meaning of ‘religion’ in the context of multiple religious belonging and the consequences of the so-called deconstruction of religion to it. I argue that we can distinguish three hermeneutics on religion and religious diversity in theology and religious studies: a hermeneutics of multiple religions, a hermeneutics of hybrid religiosity and a hermeneutics of deconstruction. Both a hermeneutics of hybrid religiosity and a hermeneutics of deconstruction challenge the common understanding of multiple religious belonging as belonging to multiple religious traditions. Following Wouter Hanegraaff and Paul Hedges, I will argue that the deconstruction of religion could make us aware that the idea of religious traditions are ultimately reified imaginative formations, which give rise to the so-called ‘World Religions’ paradigm. Following from this, we can learn how the imagination of multiple religions to which an individual can belong is always in interaction with the imagination of a hybrid or dynamic religious belonging.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 39-52 |
| Number of pages | 14 |
| Journal | Exchange |
| Volume | 47 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2018 |
Keywords
- religion
- deconstruction
- multiple religious belonging
- hermeneutics
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Multiple Religious Belonging and the 'Deconstruction' of Religion'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver