Zebrafish embryotoxicity test for developmental (neuro)toxicity: Demo case of an integrated screening approach system using anti-epileptic drugs

Anna Beker van Woudenberg, Cor Snel, Eke Rijkmans, Didima De Groot, Marga Bouma, Sanne Hermsen, Aldert Piersma, Aswin Menke, André Wolterbeek

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    Abstract

    To improve the predictability of the zebrafish embryotoxicity test (ZET) for developmental (neuro)toxicity screening, we used a multiple-endpoints strategy, including morphology, motor activity (MA), histopathology and kinetics. The model compounds used were antiepileptic drugs (AEDs): valproic acid (VPA), carbamazepine (CBZ), ethosuximide (ETH) and levetiracetam (LEV). For VPA, histopathology was the most sensitive parameter, showing effects already at 60. μM. For CBZ, morphology and MA were the most sensitive parameters, showing effects at 180. μM. For ETH, all endpoints showed similar sensitivity (6.6. mM), whereas MA was the most sensitive parameter for LEV (40. mM). Inclusion of kinetics did not alter the absolute ranking of the compounds, but the relative potency was changed considerably. Taking all together, this demo-case study showed that inclusion of multiple-endpoints in ZET may increase the sensitivity of the assay, contribute to the elucidation of the mode of toxic action and to a better definition of the applicability domain of ZET.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)101-116
    Number of pages16
    JournalReproductive Toxicology
    Volume49
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2014

    Keywords

    • Antiepileptic drugs
    • Behavior
    • Developmental (neuro)toxicity
    • Gene expression
    • Histopathology
    • Integrated test strategy
    • Kinetics
    • Zebrafish embryotoxicity test (ZET)

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Zebrafish embryotoxicity test for developmental (neuro)toxicity: Demo case of an integrated screening approach system using anti-epileptic drugs'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this