Abstract
During olefin polymerization on supported catalysts, the controlled morphological evolution of the catalyst particle is vital for ensuring optimal product properties and high catalyst activity. We employed non-destructive hard X-ray holotomography to quantitatively assess the 3D morphology of multiple silica-supported hafnocene-based catalyst particles during the early stages of gas-phase ethylene polymerization. Image processing and pore network modeling revealed clear variations in the dimensions and interconnectivity of pristine particles' macropore networks. This, together with apparent differences in the fragmentation behavior of pre-polymerized particles, suggests that the reactivity and morphological evolution of individual particles are largely dictated by their unique support and pore space architectures. By minimizing the structural heterogeneity among pristine catalyst particles, more uniform particle morphologies may be obtained. Significant polymerization activity, observed in the particles' interiors, further implies that appropriate polymerization conditions and catalyst kinetics can guarantee sufficiently high particle accessibilities and thus more homogeneous support fragmentation.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1413-1426 |
| Number of pages | 14 |
| Journal | Chem Catalysis |
| Volume | 1 |
| Issue number | 7 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 16 Dec 2021 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:This research was funded by a grant from the Dutch Polymer Institute (DPI, PO Box 902, 5600 AX Eindhoven, the Netherlands) and represents a part of the Research Program of DPI project 813. F.M. and R.V. acknowledge additional funding from a Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO) VIDI grant (723.015.007). The research was also supported by the project CALIPSOplus under Grant Agreement 730872 from the EU Framework Program for Research and Innovation Horizon 2020. The holotomography experiments were carried out at the GINIX end station of the Coherence Beamline P10 at PETRA III, DESY, a member of the Helmholtz Association (HGF). We gratefully acknowledge Tim Salditt (University of Göttingen) for his guidance and assistance in performing the holotomography experiments. Our sincere appreciation also goes to Michael Sprung (DESY), Fabian Westermeier (DESY), and Markus Osterhoff (University of Göttingen) for their experimental support at P10, as well as Marina Eckermann (University of Göttingen) and Marianna Gambino (Utrecht University) for their assistance during sample preparation. Delft Solids Solutions are acknowledged for the mercury porosimetry measurements. We would also like to thank Nicolaas Friederichs (SABIC) for his feedback on the collected data and manuscript. Conceptualization, M.J.W. and F.M.; investigation, M.J.W. R.V. L.M.L. A.R. and S.Z.; resources, C.H.; software, R.V. L.M.L. and A.R.; formal analysis, R.V. M.J.W. L.M.L. and A.R.; writing – original draft, M.J.W. and R.V.; writing – review & editing, all authors; funding acquisition, B.M.W. and F.M.; supervision, F.M. and B.M.W. The authors declare no competing interests.
Funding Information:
This research was funded by a grant from the Dutch Polymer Institute (DPI, PO Box 902, 5600 AX Eindhoven, the Netherlands) and represents a part of the Research Program of DPI project 813. F.M. and R.V. acknowledge additional funding from a Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research ( NWO ) VIDI grant ( 723.015.007 ). The research was also supported by the project CALIPSOplus under Grant Agreement 730872 from the EU Framework Program for Research and Innovation Horizon 2020 . The holotomography experiments were carried out at the GINIX end station of the Coherence Beamline P10 at PETRA III, DESY, a member of the Helmholtz Association (HGF). We gratefully acknowledge Tim Salditt (University of Göttingen) for his guidance and assistance in performing the holotomography experiments. Our sincere appreciation also goes to Michael Sprung (DESY), Fabian Westermeier (DESY), and Markus Osterhoff (University of Göttingen) for their experimental support at P10, as well as Marina Eckermann (University of Göttingen) and Marianna Gambino (Utrecht University) for their assistance during sample preparation. Delft Solids Solutions are acknowledged for the mercury porosimetry measurements. We would also like to thank Nicolaas Friederichs (SABIC) for his feedback on the collected data and manuscript.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Elsevier Inc.
Funding
This research was funded by a grant from the Dutch Polymer Institute (DPI, PO Box 902, 5600 AX Eindhoven, the Netherlands) and represents a part of the Research Program of DPI project 813. F.M. and R.V. acknowledge additional funding from a Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO) VIDI grant (723.015.007). The research was also supported by the project CALIPSOplus under Grant Agreement 730872 from the EU Framework Program for Research and Innovation Horizon 2020. The holotomography experiments were carried out at the GINIX end station of the Coherence Beamline P10 at PETRA III, DESY, a member of the Helmholtz Association (HGF). We gratefully acknowledge Tim Salditt (University of Göttingen) for his guidance and assistance in performing the holotomography experiments. Our sincere appreciation also goes to Michael Sprung (DESY), Fabian Westermeier (DESY), and Markus Osterhoff (University of Göttingen) for their experimental support at P10, as well as Marina Eckermann (University of Göttingen) and Marianna Gambino (Utrecht University) for their assistance during sample preparation. Delft Solids Solutions are acknowledged for the mercury porosimetry measurements. We would also like to thank Nicolaas Friederichs (SABIC) for his feedback on the collected data and manuscript. Conceptualization, M.J.W. and F.M.; investigation, M.J.W. R.V. L.M.L. A.R. and S.Z.; resources, C.H.; software, R.V. L.M.L. and A.R.; formal analysis, R.V. M.J.W. L.M.L. and A.R.; writing – original draft, M.J.W. and R.V.; writing – review & editing, all authors; funding acquisition, B.M.W. and F.M.; supervision, F.M. and B.M.W. The authors declare no competing interests. This research was funded by a grant from the Dutch Polymer Institute (DPI, PO Box 902, 5600 AX Eindhoven, the Netherlands) and represents a part of the Research Program of DPI project 813. F.M. and R.V. acknowledge additional funding from a Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research ( NWO ) VIDI grant ( 723.015.007 ). The research was also supported by the project CALIPSOplus under Grant Agreement 730872 from the EU Framework Program for Research and Innovation Horizon 2020 . The holotomography experiments were carried out at the GINIX end station of the Coherence Beamline P10 at PETRA III, DESY, a member of the Helmholtz Association (HGF). We gratefully acknowledge Tim Salditt (University of Göttingen) for his guidance and assistance in performing the holotomography experiments. Our sincere appreciation also goes to Michael Sprung (DESY), Fabian Westermeier (DESY), and Markus Osterhoff (University of Göttingen) for their experimental support at P10, as well as Marina Eckermann (University of Göttingen) and Marianna Gambino (Utrecht University) for their assistance during sample preparation. Delft Solids Solutions are acknowledged for the mercury porosimetry measurements. We would also like to thank Nicolaas Friederichs (SABIC) for his feedback on the collected data and manuscript.
Keywords
- fragmentation
- heterogeneity
- metallocene
- nanotomography
- polymerization
- polyolefins
- pore network modeling
- SDG9: Industry innovation and infrastructure