Wikinomics and its discontents: a critical analysis of Web 2.0 business manifestos

J. van Dijck, D. Nieborg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

'Collaborative culture', 'mass creativity' and 'co-creation' appear to be contagious buzzwords that are rapidly infecting economic and cultural discourse on Web 2.0. Allegedly, peer production models will replace opaque, top-down business models, yielding to transparent, democratic structures where power is in the shared hands of responsible companies and skilled, qualified users. Manifestos such as Wikinomics (Tapscott and Williams, 2006) and 'We-Think' (Leadbeater, 2007) argue collective culture to be the basis for digital commerce. This article analyzes the assumptions behind this Web 2.0 newspeak and unravels how business gurus try to argue the universal benefits of a democratized and collectivist digital space. They implicitly endorse a notion of public collectivism that functions entirely inside commodity culture. The logic of Wikinomics and 'We-Think' urgently begs for deconstruction, especially since it is increasingly steering mainstream cultural theory on digital culture.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)855-874
Number of pages20
JournalNew Media and Society
Volume11
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Wikinomics and its discontents: a critical analysis of Web 2.0 business manifestos'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this