Why urban setting matters in shaping tourist attitudes towards interaction with residents: Causation or selection in three urban settings

Xing Su*, Pieter Hooimeijer, Bas Spierings

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

This paper addresses the question why tourist attitude towards the interactions with residents are more positive in some urban settings than others, by comparing three different urban settings within Hong Kong: the city centre (Central), a suburban shopping/entertainment centre (Sha Tin) and a new urban tourism area (Mong Kok). Two competing hypotheses can explain the variation in tourist attitudes. The first is causation; some settings provide more intensive and better interactions which lead to more positive attitudes. The second is selection; some settings attract different types of tourists with different attitudes. Mediation analysis provides weak support for causation and strong support for selection. Sha Tin attracts more repeat tourists, holidaymakers and shopping tourists, which have more positive attitudes. Managing growth of tourism is more effective if sub-centres are developed as product-market combinations that distract these tourists from the overcrowded city-centre.

Original languageEnglish
Article number100657
Pages (from-to)1-9
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Destination Marketing and Management
Volume22
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2021

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
This work was supported by China Scholarship Council [grant number 201506190129 ].

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Elsevier Ltd

Funding

This work was supported by China Scholarship Council [grant number 201506190129 ].

Keywords

  • Causation
  • Hong Kong
  • Mainland Chinese tourists
  • Selection
  • Tourist attitude
  • Urban setting

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Why urban setting matters in shaping tourist attitudes towards interaction with residents: Causation or selection in three urban settings'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this