Why longer prison terms fail to serve a specific deterrent effect: An empirical assessment on the remembered severity of imprisonment

Ellen A C Raaijmakers*, Jan W. de Keijser, Paul Nieuwbeerta, Anja J E Dirkzwager

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

For a prison sentence to exert a specific deterrent effect, the ultimate question is that imprisonment is remembered as aversive once the offender is released, and is contemplating future criminal activities. Drawing on insights from social psychology and cognition, this study assessed (1) how inmates remember the severity of their imprisonment following release, and (2) how the severity as experienced while being incarcerated (e.g. the worst or the last moment) affects its recollected aversiveness among a sample of Dutch inmates who were released for approximately six months (n = 696). The findings indicated that the severity as experienced while being incarcerated is strongly related to the severity as recollected following release, net of the duration of confinement. Strikingly, to the extent that the length of imprisonment affected its recollected aversiveness, it did so in the opposite direction than traditional deterrence research presumes. Implications for correctional policy and future research are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)32-55
JournalPsychology, Crime and Law
Volume23
Issue number1
Early online date10 Aug 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2 Jan 2017

Keywords

  • imprisonment
  • memories
  • severity
  • Specific deterrence
  • subjective experience

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Why longer prison terms fail to serve a specific deterrent effect: An empirical assessment on the remembered severity of imprisonment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this