Abstract
We propose that power fundamentally changes why leaders punish and we develop a theoretical model that specifies how and why this occurs. Specifically, we argue that power increases the reliance on deterrence, but not just deserts, as a punishment motive and relate this to power fostering a distrustful mindset. We tested our model in 9 studies using different instantiations of power, different measurements and manipulations of distrust while measuring punishment motives and recommended punishments across a number of different situations. These 9 studies demonstrate that power fosters distrust and hereby increases both the reliance on deterrence as a punishment motive and the implementation of punishments aimed at deterrence (i.e., public punishments, public naming of rule breakers and punishments with a mandatory minimum). We discuss the practical implications for leaders, managers and policymakers and the theoretical implications for scholars interested in power, trust, and punishments.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 75-89 |
| Number of pages | 15 |
| Journal | Journal of Personality and Social Psychology |
| Volume | 109 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jul 2015 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Why leaders punish: A power perspective'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver