Why judges should be in control: IT’s and Artificial Intelligence may improve courts services but are no panacea for backlogs and speeding up proceedings.

P.M. Langbroek

Why judges should be in control: IT’s and Artificial Intelligence may improve courts services but are no panacea for backlogs and speeding up proceedings.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Professional

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	22-25
Number of pages	4
Journal	The Court Administrator
Volume	5
Publication status	Published - 28 Feb 2019

Keywords

information technology
Court Administration
Judiciary
court hearings

Access to Document

Pages from The Court Administrator 5th Edition_Winter 2019Final published version, 222 KB

Cite this

@article{79a1887264894f22b193c5a2e25050aa,

title = "Why judges should be in control: IT{\textquoteright}s and Artificial Intelligence may improve courts services but are no panacea for backlogs and speeding up proceedings.",

keywords = "information technology, Court Administration, Judiciary, court hearings",

author = "P.M. Langbroek",

year = "2019",

month = feb,

day = "28",

language = "English",

volume = "5",

pages = "22--25",

journal = "The Court Administrator",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Why judges should be in control

T2 - IT’s and Artificial Intelligence may improve courts services but are no panacea for backlogs and speeding up proceedings.

AU - Langbroek, P.M.

PY - 2019/2/28

Y1 - 2019/2/28

KW - information technology

KW - Court Administration

KW - Judiciary

KW - court hearings

M3 - Article

VL - 5

SP - 22

EP - 25

JO - The Court Administrator

JF - The Court Administrator

ER -