Why contagious yawning does not (yet) equate to empathy

Jorg J.M. Massen, Andrew C. Gallup

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Various studies and researchers have proposed a link between contagious yawning and empathy, yet the conceptual basis for the proposed connection is not clear and deserves critical evaluation. Therefore, we systematically examined the available empirical evidence addressing this association; i.e., a critical review of studies on inter-individual differences in contagion and self-reported values of empathy, differences in contagion based on familiarity or sex, and differences in contagion among individuals with psychological disorders, as well as developmental research, and brain imaging and neurophysiological studies. In doing so, we reveal a pattern of inconsistent and inconclusive evidence regarding the connection between contagious yawning and empathy. Furthermore, we identify study limitations and confounding variables, such as visual attention and social inhibition. Future research examining links between contagious yawning and empathy requires more rigorous investigation involving objective measurements to explicitly test for this connection.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)573-585
Number of pages13
JournalNeuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews
Volume80
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sept 2017
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Attentional biases
  • Contagious yawning
  • Emotional contagion
  • Empathy
  • Neuroimaging
  • Yawning
  • anterior superior temporal sulcus
  • autism
  • brain region
  • contagious yawning
  • development
  • empathy
  • human
  • nonhuman
  • posterior cingulate
  • posterior inferior frontal gyrus
  • posterior superior temporal sulcus
  • precuneus
  • priority journal
  • review
  • right hemisphere
  • schizophrenia
  • sex difference
  • ventromedial prefrontal cortex
  • yawning

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Why contagious yawning does not (yet) equate to empathy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this