Whose Responsibility? The Role of Bouncers in Policing the Public Spaces of Nightlife Districts

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

This article, based on interviews with bouncers and on ethnographic observations in two nightlife districts in the centre of two Dutch cities, Utrecht and Rotterdam, shows that public–private collaboration reveals ways of controlling public space that differ from traditional ways of policing. It demonstrates that plural policing does not automatically imply greater responsibility of private actors towards public (nightlife) spaces. A history of mistrust of private security, bouncers' increasingly ambiguous working conditions and the high levels of surveillance bouncers are subject to result in bouncers rather focusing on protecting the nightclub for which they are responsible and guaranteeing their own safety within the surveillance network, than on venturing out into public spaces to ‘protect and assure visitors' safety', as is assumed in Safe Nightlife Policies.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1251-1262
JournalInternational Journal of Urban and Regional Research
Volume39
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Whose Responsibility? The Role of Bouncers in Policing the Public Spaces of Nightlife Districts'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this