When Is a Matrix a Geographical Network?

Zachary P. Neal, Ben Derudder, Michiel van Meeteren*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Geographical networks are spatial networks in which the nodes have a socially constructed meaning; nodes represent places. All geographical networks can be represented as matrices, but not all matrices in geography represent networks. We argue that a matrix must have at least three properties to represent a geographical network: The rows and columns must represent places that can be associated through the interaction of interest, the entries must represent interactions that have significance beyond dyads, and the values of the entries must be a valid operationalization of the interaction of interest. We illustrate the relevance of the three properties through examples from the city networks literature. These properties serve as guidelines to help geographers determine whether a network analysis of their data is appropriate.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1631-1638
Number of pages8
JournalAnnals of the American Association of Geographers
Volume114
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2024

Keywords

  • geographical methodology, geographical network analysis
  • intercity
  • network
  • urban networks, urban system

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'When Is a Matrix a Geographical Network?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this