When ERGMs Lead to Biased Samples: Reply to Kretschmer et al

Sanne Smith; Frank van Tubergen; Ineke Maas; Daniel A. McFarland

doi:10.1086/727858

When ERGMs Lead to Biased Samples: Reply to Kretschmer et al

Sanne Smith^*, Frank van Tubergen, Ineke Maas, Daniel A. McFarland

^*Corresponding author for this work

Stanford University

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	586-602
Number of pages	17
Journal	American Journal of Sociology
Volume	129
Issue number	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1086/727858
Publication status	Published - Sept 2023

Access to Document

10.1086/727858

727858Final published version, 593 KBLicence: Taverne

Cite this

@article{d21fdcd6dd6c490c813b1718892a05f4,

title = "When ERGMs Lead to Biased Samples: Reply to Kretschmer et al",

author = "Sanne Smith and {van Tubergen}, Frank and Ineke Maas and McFarland, {Daniel A.}",

year = "2023",

month = sep,

doi = "10.1086/727858",

language = "English",

volume = "129",

pages = "586--602",

journal = "American Journal of Sociology",

issn = "0002-9602",

publisher = "University of Chicago",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - When ERGMs Lead to Biased Samples

T2 - Reply to Kretschmer et al

AU - Smith, Sanne

AU - van Tubergen, Frank

AU - Maas, Ineke

AU - McFarland, Daniel A.

PY - 2023/9

Y1 - 2023/9

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85177850880&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1086/727858

DO - 10.1086/727858

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85177850880

SN - 0002-9602

VL - 129

SP - 586

EP - 602

JO - American Journal of Sociology

JF - American Journal of Sociology

IS - 2

ER -

When ERGMs Lead to Biased Samples: Reply to Kretschmer et al

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this