Abstract
Major depressive disorder is a recurrent disease. Brief cognitive therapy (CT), added to either regular care or medication, is helpful in preventing relapse/recurrence, even over 5.5 year (Bockting et al., 2005, 2009). However, not all patients profit from preventive CT. Little is known which type of persons benefit from preventive CT, the so called aptitude treatment interaction effect.
The present cohort included exclusively patients with at least two previous episodes remitted on various types of treatments (n = 172). They were assessed within a clinical trial comparing treatment as usual (TAU) with preventive CT added to TAU. Differential demographic, illness-related, psychological and biological risk factors in postponing recurrence by preventive CT were examined.
Significant aptitudetreatment-interaction effects were found for the number
of previous episodes, daily hassles and life events, avoidant coping, gender, and morning cortisol levels (Bockting et al., 2006). Preventive CT seemed ineffective in patients with life events (as more frequently reported by women in our study) and in patients with high episode number characterized by higher levels of avoidant coping. Generic predictors indicate that in CT, as in TAU, patients with more residual depressive symptomatology and higher levels of dysfunctional attitudes profit less from preventive CT.
In conclusion, the finding that preventive CT protects against the influence of a consistently found risk factor of relapse/recurrence, i.e. the number of depressive episodes, underlines the potential of psychological preventive interventions. Preventive CT seemed to be especially effective in reducing presumably internally provoked, relapse/recurrence but may be quite ineffective in reducing externally provoked relapse/recurrence. CT possibly prevents either stress generation or disrupts kindling effects.
The present cohort included exclusively patients with at least two previous episodes remitted on various types of treatments (n = 172). They were assessed within a clinical trial comparing treatment as usual (TAU) with preventive CT added to TAU. Differential demographic, illness-related, psychological and biological risk factors in postponing recurrence by preventive CT were examined.
Significant aptitudetreatment-interaction effects were found for the number
of previous episodes, daily hassles and life events, avoidant coping, gender, and morning cortisol levels (Bockting et al., 2006). Preventive CT seemed ineffective in patients with life events (as more frequently reported by women in our study) and in patients with high episode number characterized by higher levels of avoidant coping. Generic predictors indicate that in CT, as in TAU, patients with more residual depressive symptomatology and higher levels of dysfunctional attitudes profit less from preventive CT.
In conclusion, the finding that preventive CT protects against the influence of a consistently found risk factor of relapse/recurrence, i.e. the number of depressive episodes, underlines the potential of psychological preventive interventions. Preventive CT seemed to be especially effective in reducing presumably internally provoked, relapse/recurrence but may be quite ineffective in reducing externally provoked relapse/recurrence. CT possibly prevents either stress generation or disrupts kindling effects.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Publication status | Published - 2010 |
| Externally published | Yes |
| Event | Paper presented at the World Congress of Behavioural & Cognitive Therapies (WCBCT) - Boston, USA Duration: 1 Jan 2010 → … |
Conference
| Conference | Paper presented at the World Congress of Behavioural & Cognitive Therapies (WCBCT) |
|---|---|
| City | Boston, USA |
| Period | 1/01/10 → … |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'What works for whom in preventing relapse in recurrent depression using cognitive therapy?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver