What works best: Objective Statistics or a Personal Testimonial? An Assessment of the Persuasive Effects of Different Types of Message Evidence on Risk Perception

J.B.F. De Wit; R. Vet; E. Das

What works best: Objective Statistics or a Personal Testimonial? An Assessment of the Persuasive Effects of Different Types of Message Evidence on Risk Perception

extern

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

Original language	Undefined/Unknown
Pages (from-to)	110-115
Number of pages	6
Journal	Health Psychology
Volume	27
Publication status	Published - 2008

Keywords

Psychologie (PSYC)

Cite this

@article{2e4460ad9e504c55a0877fccf16a746c,

title = "What works best: Objective Statistics or a Personal Testimonial? An Assessment of the Persuasive Effects of Different Types of Message Evidence on Risk Perception",

keywords = "Psychologie (PSYC)",

author = "{De Wit}, J.B.F. and R. Vet and E. Das",

year = "2008",

language = "Undefined/Unknown",

volume = "27",

pages = "110--115",

journal = "Health Psychology",

issn = "0278-6133",

publisher = "American Psychological Association",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - What works best: Objective Statistics or a Personal Testimonial? An Assessment of the Persuasive Effects of Different Types of Message Evidence on Risk Perception

AU - De Wit, J.B.F.

AU - Vet, R.

AU - Das, E.

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

KW - Psychologie (PSYC)

M3 - Article

SN - 0278-6133

VL - 27

SP - 110

EP - 115

JO - Health Psychology

JF - Health Psychology

ER -