What structural priming can and cannot reveal

Loes Koring; E.J. Reuland

doi:10.1017/S0140525X17000462

What structural priming can and cannot reveal

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/Letter to the editor › Academic › peer-review

Abstract

The nature of mental representations of linguistic expressions in relation to the time course from intention to articulation is a major issue. We discuss Branigan & Pickering’s (B&P’s) proposal to use structural priming to tap into this process. We show that their interpretation of their findings cannot be maintained. We reinterpret these results and suggest a revision of their conclusions.

Original language	English
Article number	e298
Pages (from-to)	31-32
Number of pages	2
Journal	Behavioral and Brain Sciences
Volume	40
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X17000462
Publication status	Published - 2017

Access to Document

10.1017/S0140525X17000462Licence: Unspecified

what_structural_priming_can_and_cannot_revealFinal published version, 120 KBLicence: Taverne

Cite this

@article{ae35f933655d498fb2fd43d108fcfb43,

title = "What structural priming can and cannot reveal",

abstract = "The nature of mental representations of linguistic expressions in relation to the time course from intention to articulation is a major issue. We discuss Branigan \& Pickering{\textquoteright}s (B\&P{\textquoteright}s) proposal to use structural priming to tap into this process. We show that their interpretation of their findings cannot be maintained. We reinterpret these results and suggest a revision of their conclusions.",

author = "Loes Koring and E.J. Reuland",

year = "2017",

doi = "10.1017/S0140525X17000462",

language = "English",

volume = "40",

pages = "31--32",

journal = "Behavioral and Brain Sciences",

issn = "0140-525X",

publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - What structural priming can and cannot reveal

AU - Koring, Loes

AU - Reuland, E.J.

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - The nature of mental representations of linguistic expressions in relation to the time course from intention to articulation is a major issue. We discuss Branigan & Pickering’s (B&P’s) proposal to use structural priming to tap into this process. We show that their interpretation of their findings cannot be maintained. We reinterpret these results and suggest a revision of their conclusions.

AB - The nature of mental representations of linguistic expressions in relation to the time course from intention to articulation is a major issue. We discuss Branigan & Pickering’s (B&P’s) proposal to use structural priming to tap into this process. We show that their interpretation of their findings cannot be maintained. We reinterpret these results and suggest a revision of their conclusions.

U2 - 10.1017/S0140525X17000462

DO - 10.1017/S0140525X17000462

M3 - Comment/Letter to the editor

SN - 0140-525X

VL - 40

SP - 31

EP - 32

JO - Behavioral and Brain Sciences

JF - Behavioral and Brain Sciences

M1 - e298

ER -

What structural priming can and cannot reveal

Abstract

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this