What are socially disruptive technologies?

Jeroen Hopster*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Scholarly discourse on “disruptive technologies” has been strongly influenced by disruptive innovation theory. This theory is tailored for analyzing disruptions in markets and business. It is of limited use, however, in analyzing the broader social, moral and existential dynamics of technosocial disruption. Yet these broader dynamics should be of great scholarly concern, both in coming to terms with technological disruptions of the past and those of our current age. Technologies can disrupt social relations, institutions, epistemic paradigms, foundational concepts, values, and even the nature of human cognition and experience – domains of disruption that are largely neglected in existing discourse on disruptive technologies. Accordingly, this paper seeks to reorient scholarly discussion around a broader notion of technosocial disruption. This broader notion raises three foundational questions. First, how can technosocial disruption be conceptualized in a way that clearly sets it apart from the disruptive innovation framework? Secondly, how does the notion of technosocial disruption relate to the concordant notions of “disruptor” and “disruptiveness”? Thirdly, can we advance criteria to assess the “degree of social disruptiveness” of different technologies? The paper clarifies these questions and proposes an answer to each of them. In doing so, it advances “technosocial disruption” as a key analysandum for future scholarship on the interactions between technology and society.

Original languageEnglish
Article number101750
Number of pages8
JournalTechnology in Society
Volume67
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2021

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
This work is part of the research programme Ethics of Socially Disruptive Technologies, which is funded through the Gravitation programme of the Dutch Ministry of Education, Culture, and Science and the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research under Grant number 024.004.031 . I thank the ESDiT online Workshop 2020, the ESDiT F&S Colloquium 2021, the Tilburg MA seminar 2021, SPT 2021, DiTTET 2021, and the 4TU.Ethics Biannual Conference 2021 for opportunities to present this work, and thank participants for their valuable feedback. Special thanks to Julia Hermann, with whom I collaborated in outlining criteria for disruptiveness (section 5).

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Author(s)

Funding

This work is part of the research programme Ethics of Socially Disruptive Technologies, which is funded through the Gravitation programme of the Dutch Ministry of Education, Culture, and Science and the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research under Grant number 024.004.031 . I thank the ESDiT online Workshop 2020, the ESDiT F&S Colloquium 2021, the Tilburg MA seminar 2021, SPT 2021, DiTTET 2021, and the 4TU.Ethics Biannual Conference 2021 for opportunities to present this work, and thank participants for their valuable feedback. Special thanks to Julia Hermann, with whom I collaborated in outlining criteria for disruptiveness (section 5).

Keywords

  • Disruptive technologies
  • Disruptiveness
  • Society
  • Technology
  • Technosocial disruption

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'What are socially disruptive technologies?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this