Weighing of Evidence by Health Technology Assessment Bodies: Retrospective Study of Reimbursement Recommendations for Conditionally Approved Drugs

Rick A Vreman, Jacoline C Bouvy, Lourens T Bloem, Anke M Hövels, Aukje K Mantel-Teeuwisse, Hubert G M Leufkens, Wim G Goettsch

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

This study assessed whether five Health Technology Assessment (HTA) bodies in Europe were more negative about drugs with a Conditional Marketing Authorization (CMA) that are approved without controlled studies compared to CMA drugs that are approved based on controlled studies. The HTA recommendations were categorized into positive, restricted, and negative. A total of 92 HTA recommendations were available for 27 drugs. Thirty of 62 (48%) and 17 of 30 (57%) of the recommendations were negative for drugs with and without controlled studies, respectively. Overall, only 12 (13%) recommendations were positive. In all jurisdictions, recommendations between drugs with and drugs without controlled data were comparable, which suggests that the presence of controlled data is not decisive in HTA evaluations. The small proportion of unrestricted positive recommendations highlights difficulties with recommending the drugs in this cohort, which may be caused by scientific uncertainty or other factors. Earlier collaboration between stakeholders is advised in order to improve patient access.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)684-691
Number of pages8
JournalClinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics
Volume105
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Weighing of Evidence by Health Technology Assessment Bodies: Retrospective Study of Reimbursement Recommendations for Conditionally Approved Drugs'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this