Weaknesses of wickedness: a critical perspective on wickedness theory

Mirko Noordegraaf*, Scott Douglas, Karin Geuijen, Martijn Van Der Steen

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

It is attractive to frame societal challenges such as climate change, terrorism and migration as ‘wicked issues’. Wickedness theory in its various guises has become popular as it connects the uncertain and political nature of issues with hopeful strategies for strengthening networks, trust and learning. In this paper we take a critical approach towards wickedness, advancing three criticisms: (1) the daily experiences of people and their practices are missing from the grand narratives about wickedness, (2) the potential of collaborations and learning to address these problems is romanticized, (3) the implications for managerial and professional perspectives are unclear. We argue that the wickedness literature can be strengthened by further emphasizing situated relations, routines and rituals, adopting the perspective of situated wickedness. This would link insight into grand wickedness to insights into daily ambiguity. We illustrate this argument with two specific cases, (counter)terrorism and forced migration/refugees.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)278-297
Number of pages20
JournalPolicy and Society
Volume38
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 27 May 2019

Keywords

  • acts
  • experimentalist governance
  • networks
  • professionals
  • Wicked issues
  • wickedness theory

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Weaknesses of wickedness: a critical perspective on wickedness theory'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this