Abstract
Philanthropic foundations are key players in global sustainability governance. This paper explores the legitimation strategies these foundations use to justify their actions and positions in the sustainable development community. By combining Theo van Leeuwen’s legitimation framework with our novel analytical justice framework, we offer a new tool to analyse hard-to-research actors. Analysing data from 41 foundation websites, we find that foundations emphasize Global Egalitarian Cosmopolitanism in their values and objectives to align with global sustainability discourses. However, Libertarian ideas dominate when discussing programs and founders. This indicates there may be internal conflicts within foundations over the relationship between extreme wealth accumulation required for global philanthropy and sustainability objectives. In turn, this has implications for how foundations position themselves as agents of justice in sustainable development. While discourse analysis provides valuable insights into philanthropic legitimation strategies, further research is needed to fully understand how justice intersects with organizational decision-making.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Number of pages | 28 |
Journal | Journal of Language and Politics |
DOIs | |
Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 6 Jan 2025 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Funding
This research was funded by the Dutch Research Council (NWO) as part of the BEYONDGIVING Project ( Project numberWI.210017.1). Open Access publication of this article was funded through a Transformative Agreement with Utrecht University.
Funders | Funder number |
---|---|
Dutch Research Council (NWO) as part of the BEYONDGIVING Project | WI.210017.1 |
Utrecht University |
Keywords
- critical discourse studies
- justice
- legitimation
- philanthropy
- sustainable development