Waste management alternatives: (Dis)economies of scale in recovery and decoupling

Julia Swart*, Loek Groot

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

This paper formulates a theoretical model which allows different waste management strategies in equilibrium, depending on the technology of waste recovery and the utility functional specification. In the model there are two waste treatment alternatives: 'not-recovered waste', composed of landfill and incineration without recovery and 'recovered waste', which is the aggregate of recycling, composting and incineration with recovery. We show that if recovery activities present constant or economies of scale then it is optimal to have zero not-recovered waste. The presence of diseconomies of scale in recovery of waste can either result in an equilibrium with zero or positive not-recovered waste, but recovery of waste is necessarily positive. We test for the presence of an EKC, and find that it is only compatible in our model when we assume decreasing marginal utility of consumption, and diseconomies of scale are limited. However, in the presence of (constant) economies of scale in recovery, we observe complete decoupling.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)43-55
Number of pages13
JournalResources, Conservation and Recycling
Volume94
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Keywords

  • Decoupling
  • Economies of scale
  • Environmental Kuznets Curve
  • Landfill
  • Recycling
  • Waste disposal

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Waste management alternatives: (Dis)economies of scale in recovery and decoupling'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this