Abstract
How can we engage ethnographically with the often overlooked toxic and explosive effects of war and their harmful, frequently multi-generational, legacies? The oversight is notable because war waste insidiously contaminates and transforms entire environments, making them lethal for humans and non-humans alike at different scales and over different time frames. While anthropologists have critically examined the social, political, material, and emotional effects and experiences, ranging from militarism to large-scale armed conflicts, they have only recently turned their attention to ‘the knotted inextricability of war and ecologies’ (Guarasci and Kim). War ecologies is not simply a capacious concept, however. The concept can also become a seductive form of ethnographic knowledge. We build on the idea of ethnographic seduction (Robben) as a method for problematising the blind spots, omissions, and displacements that may arise in ethnographic research on war and its ecological legacies.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 183-201 |
| Number of pages | 19 |
| Journal | War & society |
| Volume | 45 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| Early online date | 19 Apr 2026 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Aug 2026 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2026 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- War ecologies
- anthropology
- ecocide
- ethnographic seductions
- ethnography
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'War ecologies and their seductions: An Introduction'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver