Waarheid en interpretatie in etnografie (deel 2): Discrepanties bij marginale groepen en geüniformeerde beroepen

Translated title of the contribution: Truth and interpretation in ethnography.: Discrepancies with marginalized groups and uniformed services

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Truth and interpretation in ethnography (part 2): Discrepancies with marginalized
groups and uniformed professions

This essay is the second part of my contribution to an ongoing discussion
in KWALON on evidence and truth in ethnography. I stress that
ethnography is inferential and involves interpretation work, and in this
part specifically I shift the attention from the problems of truth about the
field to those in it. Using ethnographic material from Alice Goffman and
insights from studies of the uniformed services, I focus on the discrepancies
that result from secrecy and truth work. Relative, coherent and holistic
truths thus emerge in the field. These pose special challenges for writing
ethnography; deploying experience requires rhetorical strategies. The
emergent character of truth also entails scrutinizing the ‘facts of fieldwork’
and steering clear of the subjectivist and objectivist fallacies of empiricist
functionalism. I end the essay with three methodological tips, inviting
further research into how secrecy and truth work relate to domination
and resistance.
Translated title of the contributionTruth and interpretation in ethnography.: Discrepancies with marginalized groups and uniformed services
Original languageDutch
Pages (from-to)6-25
Number of pages20
JournalKWALON
Volume27
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2022

Keywords

  • truth
  • interpretation
  • discrepancies
  • ethnographic facts
  • secrecy
  • truth work

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Truth and interpretation in ethnography. Discrepancies with marginalized groups and uniformed services'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this