TY - JOUR
T1 - Variations of riskification
T2 - Climate change adaptation in four European cities
AU - Barquet, Karina
AU - Morsut, Claudia
AU - Rhinard, Mark
AU - Englund, Mathilda
AU - Mees, Heleen
AU - Engen, Ole Andreas Hegland
AU - Neby, Simon
AU - Jochemsen, Nenya
AU - Angell, Elisabeth
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Author(s). Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Policy Studies Organization.
PY - 2024/12
Y1 - 2024/12
N2 - This study explores the manifestations of riskification in climate change adaptation (CCA) across four European cities, examining the roles of actors, discourses, and tools. Through comparative analysis, it aims to delineate local riskification, identifying similarities and differences among the cases. Three intervening factors – ideational frameworks, organization of government, and actor networks – are assessed to comprehend the amplification or deceleration of riskification processes locally. Findings reveal that ideational frameworks shape responses to climate change challenges within each case, while government organization influences CCA strategies and funding mechanisms. Actor networks play a pivotal role in shaping CCA efforts, including measurement, modeling, and monitoring. Despite commonalities, the analysis revealed that the intervening factors are further conditioned in each specific case, albeit in different ways, by aspects not initially considered: the influence of risk culture, risk memory, and technocratic governance in local CCA in each situation. These nuances produce variations of riskification that are locally distinct but equally depoliticize climate change risks, overshadowing broader societal implications and impeding transformative approaches. In particular, the dominance of riskified CCA approaches with technocratic characteristics and limited urgency may hinder innovative strategies required for addressing complex CCA challenges.
AB - This study explores the manifestations of riskification in climate change adaptation (CCA) across four European cities, examining the roles of actors, discourses, and tools. Through comparative analysis, it aims to delineate local riskification, identifying similarities and differences among the cases. Three intervening factors – ideational frameworks, organization of government, and actor networks – are assessed to comprehend the amplification or deceleration of riskification processes locally. Findings reveal that ideational frameworks shape responses to climate change challenges within each case, while government organization influences CCA strategies and funding mechanisms. Actor networks play a pivotal role in shaping CCA efforts, including measurement, modeling, and monitoring. Despite commonalities, the analysis revealed that the intervening factors are further conditioned in each specific case, albeit in different ways, by aspects not initially considered: the influence of risk culture, risk memory, and technocratic governance in local CCA in each situation. These nuances produce variations of riskification that are locally distinct but equally depoliticize climate change risks, overshadowing broader societal implications and impeding transformative approaches. In particular, the dominance of riskified CCA approaches with technocratic characteristics and limited urgency may hinder innovative strategies required for addressing complex CCA challenges.
KW - governance
KW - local adaptation
KW - risk
KW - securitization
KW - technocracy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85210029356&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/rhc3.12322
DO - 10.1002/rhc3.12322
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85210029356
SN - 1944-4079
VL - 15
SP - 491
EP - 517
JO - Risk, Hazards and Crisis in Public Policy
JF - Risk, Hazards and Crisis in Public Policy
IS - 4
ER -