Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Validation of an automated system for at-slaughter assessment of footpad dermatitis and hock burn in broiler chickens

  • N van Staaveren
  • , Kenny van Langeveld
  • , J Schulte-Landwehr
  • , J Mulder
  • , P Galliot
  • , P Créach
  • , P Sztandarski
  • , J Marchewka
  • , B Forkman
  • , N Van Noten
  • , Frank A.M. Tuyttens
  • , M F Giersberg
  • , T B Rodenburg*
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • University of Guelph
  • Ghent University
  • CLK GmbH
  • Institut Technique de l'aviculture - ITAVI
  • Institute of Genetics and Animal Biotechnology of the Polish Academy of Sciences
  • University of Copenhagen
  • Flanders Research Institute for Agriculture

Research output: Contribution to conferenceAbstractAcademic

Abstract

The automated assessment of footpad dermatitis and hock burn via camera systems at the slaughterline could allow continuous monitoring of these important welfare indicators in broiler chickens. This study aimed to compare the performance of a camera system (ChickenCheck software, CLK GmbH) against three human assessors. Footpad dermatitis (4 point scale based on relative size of the lesions compared to the footpad) and hock burn (3 point scale based on absolute size of the lesions) were scored on both the left and right foot and hock according to severity from images captured by the camera system. A total of 50 images (100 feet and hocks) were used in the training dataset used to train the human assessors and 500 images (1,000 feet and hocks) were used in the validation dataset to determine measures of agreement and reliability for the discrete scoring system. Additionally, 100 images were used for lesion annotation (200 feet and hock) to determine the agreement between the camera system and the human assessors in capturing the total area affected by lesions. Despite showing substantial to good intra-observer reliability (kappa: 0.78-0.98) and moderate to substantial inter-observer reliability (kappa: 0.46-0.66) during training, the human assessors showed fair to moderate agreement (kappa: 0.33-0.47) for footpad dermatitis and hock burn when the dataset included a larger number of images with greater variation in lesion severity and appearance. However, the human assessors showed moderate to substantial agreement with the scores assigned by the camera system (0.60-0.70). More importantly, human assessors and camera system are highly correlated when it comes to indicating the size of lesions on the footpad (R 2: 0.93) and hock burn (R 2: 0.97), suggesting that lesions are correctly annotated by the camera system. However, the small but systematic differences found in the size of the affected area of footpad dermatitis (+2.47%) and hock burn (-0.38 cm 2) by the camera system compared to the human assessors need to be addressed to further improve the performance of the automated system.

Original languageEnglish
Number of pages1
Publication statusPublished - 23 Jun 2026
EventScience for Animal Welfare - Centenary Conference -
Duration: 23 Jun 202625 Jun 2026

Conference

ConferenceScience for Animal Welfare - Centenary Conference
Period23/06/2625/06/26

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Validation of an automated system for at-slaughter assessment of footpad dermatitis and hock burn in broiler chickens'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this