TY - JOUR
T1 - Upper bounding rainbow connection number by forest number.
AU - Chandran, L. Sunil
AU - Issac, Davis
AU - Lauri, Juho
AU - Leeuwen, Erik Jan van
N1 - Funding Information:
The major part of the work was done when this author was on a long-term research visit at Max Planck Institute for Informatics, Saarbrücken, Germany. The visit was funded by the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation fellowship.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2022/7
Y1 - 2022/7
N2 - A path in an edge-colored graph is rainbow if no two edges of it are colored the same, and the graph is rainbow-connected if there is a rainbow path between each pair of its vertices. The minimum number of colors needed to rainbow-connect a graph G is the rainbow connection number of G, denoted by rc(G). A simple way to rainbow-connect a graph G is to color the edges of a spanning tree with distinct colors and then re-use any of these colors to color the remaining edges of G. This proves that rc(G)≤|V(G)|−1. We ask whether there is a stronger connection between tree-like structures and rainbow coloring than that is implied by the above trivial argument. For instance, is it possible to find an upper bound of t(G)−1 for rc(G), where t(G) is the number of vertices in the largest induced tree of G? The answer turns out to be negative, as there are counter-examples that show that even c⋅t(G) is not an upper bound for rc(G) for any given constant c. In this work we show that if we consider the forest number f(G), the number of vertices in a maximum induced forest of G, instead of t(G), then surprisingly we do get an upper bound. More specifically, we prove that rc(G)≤f(G)+2. Our result indicates a stronger connection between rainbow connection and tree-like structures than that was suggested by the simple spanning tree based upper bound.
AB - A path in an edge-colored graph is rainbow if no two edges of it are colored the same, and the graph is rainbow-connected if there is a rainbow path between each pair of its vertices. The minimum number of colors needed to rainbow-connect a graph G is the rainbow connection number of G, denoted by rc(G). A simple way to rainbow-connect a graph G is to color the edges of a spanning tree with distinct colors and then re-use any of these colors to color the remaining edges of G. This proves that rc(G)≤|V(G)|−1. We ask whether there is a stronger connection between tree-like structures and rainbow coloring than that is implied by the above trivial argument. For instance, is it possible to find an upper bound of t(G)−1 for rc(G), where t(G) is the number of vertices in the largest induced tree of G? The answer turns out to be negative, as there are counter-examples that show that even c⋅t(G) is not an upper bound for rc(G) for any given constant c. In this work we show that if we consider the forest number f(G), the number of vertices in a maximum induced forest of G, instead of t(G), then surprisingly we do get an upper bound. More specifically, we prove that rc(G)≤f(G)+2. Our result indicates a stronger connection between rainbow connection and tree-like structures than that was suggested by the simple spanning tree based upper bound.
KW - Forest number
KW - Rainbow connection
KW - Upper bound
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85125457048&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/J.DISC.2022.112829
DO - 10.1016/J.DISC.2022.112829
M3 - Article
SN - 0012-365X
VL - 345
SP - 112829
JO - Discrete Mathematics
JF - Discrete Mathematics
IS - 7
M1 - 112829
ER -