Abstract
In this article, in response to Zontek’s research, it is examined whether the case-law of the ECtHR indeed gives rise to the conclusion that the forced unlocking of an electronic data carrier would constitute a violation of the privilege against self-incrimination. The authors concludes that this is not the case: when law enforcement authorities use light physical force, the ECtHR will not be able to establish a violation.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 285-301 |
| Number of pages | 17 |
| Journal | European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice |
| Volume | 33 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Sept 2025 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© D.A.G. van Toor and G. Pesselse, 2025.
Keywords
- biometrics
- privilege against self-incriminating
- unlocking smartphones
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Unlocking the Meaning of the Privilege against Self-Incrimination for Biometrically Secured Smartphones'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver