Understanding why civil servants are reluctant to carry out transition tasks

Rik B Braams*, Joeri H Wesseling, Albert J Meijer, Marko P Hekkert

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

The transition literature attributes various transition tasks to government to support socio-technical transitions toward overcoming societal challenges. It is, however, difficult for civil servants to execute these transition tasks, because they partly conflict with Public Administration (PA) traditions that provide legitimacy to their work. This dilemma is discussed in neither the transition literature nor the PA literature. In this paper, we ask civil servants about the normative arguments that reflect their role perception within the institutional structures of their ministry, when it comes to executing transition tasks. We see these situated and enacted normative arguments and underlying assumptions as implicit rules determining legitimacy. The arguments civil servants used confirm that transition tasks are currently difficult to execute within the civil service. We found seven institutionalized rules that explain this difficulty and highlight the inadequacy of civil servants to adhere to the PA traditions while trying to execute transition tasks.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)905-914
JournalScience and Public Policy
Volume49
Issue number6
Early online dateJul 2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2022

Keywords

  • Transition
  • government
  • civil service
  • public administration
  • institutional rules
  • legitimacy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Understanding why civil servants are reluctant to carry out transition tasks'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this