Abstract
The use of science to inform and underpin decision-making on natural resources is not self-evident as stakeholders often use science in a selective and strategic way. Scientific analyses of science utilisation often focus on how the science-policy interface is organised and from this perspective provide recommendations to scientists about how they can increase their contribution to decision-making. Yet in this paper we argue that a wider perspective on the science-policy interface, in particular by analysing the roles and interactions of actors other than those directly involved, provides both additional explanations and new points of application for strategies aimed at enhancing science utilisation. We illustrate our claim by means of an analysis of decision-making on cockle fisheries and gas mining in the Dutch Wadden Sea between the 1990s and 2004. For many years, scientific studies addressing the ecological effects of these activities were not used to meaningfully contribute to decision-making. In 2004 this situation changed radically. Explanations include the role of intermediaries between scientists, stakeholders and decision-makers and new legislation. Scientists could enhance the chances of knowledge utilisation both by creating a more open science-policy interface and by reframing the policy problems at issue. © 2010 Elsevier Ltd.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 239-248 |
Number of pages | 10 |
Journal | Environmental Science & Policy |
Volume | 13 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 May 2010 |
Keywords
- Controversy
- Ecological science
- Knowledge utilisation
- Science-policy interface
- Wadden Sea
- article
- cockle
- decision support system
- environmental impact assessment
- fishery management
- gas
- government regulation
- information processing
- information science
- knowledge management
- mining
- Netherlands
- priority journal
- scientist
- sea
- strategic planning
- theoretical study