Understanding the causes and consequences of segregation in youth’s friendship networks: Opportunities and challenges for research

Lars Leszczensky, T.H. Stark

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Youth in modern Western countries grow up in diverse societies. Yet research shows that their friendship networks tend to be segregated along ethnic, racial, and religious lines. Understanding how and why such friendship segregation arises is necessary to eventually promote social integration. Research has shown that the composition and structure of friendship networks can influence the development of a wide range of individual attitudes and behavior. In this chapter, the authors show how social network analysis (SNA) advances our knowledge of the causes and consequences of segregation in youth’s friendship networks. They first highlight competing and complementary theoretical considerations regarding the emergence of friendship segregation. They then discuss methodological advantages of SNA over traditional approaches to obtain insights into such processes. After discussing key findings on the causes and consequences of network segregation, they close the chapter by pointing to open research questions and related challenges for future research.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationYouth in Superdiverse Societies
Subtitle of host publicationGrowing up with globalization, diversity, and acculturation
EditorsPeter F. Titzmann, Philipp Jugert
Place of PublicationLondon
PublisherRoutledge
Chapter14
Pages233-248
Number of pages16
Edition1
ISBN (Electronic)9781351040266
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Publication series

NameStudies in Adolescent Development
PublisherRoutledge

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 selection and editorial matter, Peter F. Titzmann and Philipp Jugert.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Understanding the causes and consequences of segregation in youth’s friendship networks: Opportunities and challenges for research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this