TY - JOUR
T1 - Uncovering the (un)attended: Pupil light responses index persistent biases of spatial attention in neglect
AU - Ten Brink, AF
AU - Van Heijst, Marlies
AU - Portengen, Brendan
AU - Naber, Marnix
AU - Strauch, Christoph
N1 - Funding Information:
M. Naber was funded by an UitZicht grant 2018–10 (Rotterdamse Stichting Blindenbelangen). B.L. Portengen was funded by the ODAS foundation (grant number 2017–03 ), the Rotterdamse Stichting Blindenbelangen (grant number B20170004 ), the F.P. Fischer Foundation (grant number 170511 ), and the Janivo Foundation (grant number 2017170 ). The funders had no role in the study design, collection, management, analysis and interpretation of data.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Author(s)
PY - 2023/10
Y1 - 2023/10
N2 - Visuospatial neglect is a frequent and disabling disorder, mostly after stroke, that presents in impaired awareness to stimuli on one side of space. Neglect causes disability and functional dependence, even long after the injury. Improving measurements of the core attentional deficit might hold the key for better understanding of the condition and development of treatment. We present a rapid, pupillometry-based method that assesses automatic biases in (covert) attention, without requiring behavioral responses. We exploit the phenomenon that pupil light responses scale with the degree of covert attention to stimuli, and thereby reveal what draws (no) attention. Participants with left-sided neglect after right-sided lesions following stroke (n = 5), participants with hemianopia/quadrantanopia following stroke (n = 11), and controls (n = 22) were presented with two vertical bars, one of which was white and one of which was black, while fixating the center. We varied which brightness was left and right, respectively across trials. In line with the hypotheses, participants with neglect demonstrated biased pupil light responses to the brightness on the right side. Participants with hemianopia showed similar biases to intact parts of the visual field, whilst controls exhibited no bias. Together, this demonstrates that the pupil light response can reveal not only visual, but also attentional deficits. Strikingly, our pupillometry-based bias estimates were not in agreement with neuropsychological paper-and-pencil assessments conducted on the same day, but were with those administered in an earlier phase post-stroke. Potentially, we pick up on persistent biases in the covert attentional system that participants increasingly compensate for in classical neuropsychological tasks and everyday life. The here proposed method may not only find clinical application, but also advance theory and aid the development of successful restoration therapies by introducing a precise, longitudinally valid, and objective measurement that might not be affected by compensation.
AB - Visuospatial neglect is a frequent and disabling disorder, mostly after stroke, that presents in impaired awareness to stimuli on one side of space. Neglect causes disability and functional dependence, even long after the injury. Improving measurements of the core attentional deficit might hold the key for better understanding of the condition and development of treatment. We present a rapid, pupillometry-based method that assesses automatic biases in (covert) attention, without requiring behavioral responses. We exploit the phenomenon that pupil light responses scale with the degree of covert attention to stimuli, and thereby reveal what draws (no) attention. Participants with left-sided neglect after right-sided lesions following stroke (n = 5), participants with hemianopia/quadrantanopia following stroke (n = 11), and controls (n = 22) were presented with two vertical bars, one of which was white and one of which was black, while fixating the center. We varied which brightness was left and right, respectively across trials. In line with the hypotheses, participants with neglect demonstrated biased pupil light responses to the brightness on the right side. Participants with hemianopia showed similar biases to intact parts of the visual field, whilst controls exhibited no bias. Together, this demonstrates that the pupil light response can reveal not only visual, but also attentional deficits. Strikingly, our pupillometry-based bias estimates were not in agreement with neuropsychological paper-and-pencil assessments conducted on the same day, but were with those administered in an earlier phase post-stroke. Potentially, we pick up on persistent biases in the covert attentional system that participants increasingly compensate for in classical neuropsychological tasks and everyday life. The here proposed method may not only find clinical application, but also advance theory and aid the development of successful restoration therapies by introducing a precise, longitudinally valid, and objective measurement that might not be affected by compensation.
KW - Covert attention
KW - Hemianopia
KW - Pupillometry
KW - Spatial attention
KW - Unilateral neglect
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85166580671&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.cortex.2023.06.008
DO - 10.1016/j.cortex.2023.06.008
M3 - Article
SN - 0010-9452
VL - 167
SP - 101
EP - 114
JO - Cortex
JF - Cortex
ER -