Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Uncovering the Structure of Semantic Representations Using a Computational Model of Decision‐Making

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

According to logical theories of meaning, a meaning of an expression can be formalized and encoded in truth conditions. Vagueness of the language and individual differences between people are a challenge to incorporate into the meaning representations. In this paper, we propose a new approach to study truth-conditional representations of vague concepts. For a case study, we selected two natural language quantifiers most and more than half. We conducted two online experiments, each with 90 native English speakers. In the first experiment, we tested between-subjects variability in meaning representations. In the second experiment, we tested the stability of meaning representations over time by testing the same group of participants in two experimental sessions. In both experiments, participants performed the verification task. They verified a sentence with a quantifier (e.g., “Most of the gleerbs are feezda.”) based on the numerical information provided in the second sentence, (e.g., “60% of the gleerbs are feezda”). To investigate between-subject and within-subject differences in meaning representations, we proposed an extended version of the Diffusion Decision Model with two parameters capturing truth conditions and vagueness. We fit the model to responses and reaction times data. In the first experiment, we found substantial between-subject differences in representations of most as reflected by the variability in the truth conditions. Moreover, we found that the verification of most is proportion-dependent as reflected in the reaction time effect and model parameter. In the second experiment, we showed that quantifier representations are stable over time as reflected in stable model parameters across two experimental sessions. These findings challenge semantic theories that assume the truth-conditional equivalence of most and more than half and contribute to the representational theory of vague concepts. The current study presents a promising approach to study semantic representations, which can have a wide application in experimental linguistics.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere13234
Number of pages39
JournalCognitive Science
Volume47
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2023

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
Sonia Ramotowska, Shane Steinert‐Threlkeld, and Jakub Szymanik have received funding from the European Research Council under the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme (FP/2007‐2013)/ERC Grant Agreement n. STG 716230 CoSaQ. We thank Fabian Schlotterbeck, Milica Denić, and Fausto Carcassi for the discussion and comments on the early draft of this manuscript.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Authors. Cognitive Science published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Cognitive Science Society (CSS).

Keywords

  • Quantifiers
  • Computational modeling
  • Semantics
  • Decision-making
  • Individual difference
  • Diffusion Decision Model

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Uncovering the Structure of Semantic Representations Using a Computational Model of Decision‐Making'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this