Abstract
This study investigated the amounts of problem-solving process information ("action," "why," "how," and "metacognitive") elicited by means of concurrent, retrospective, and cued retrospective reporting. In a within-participants design, 26 participants completed electrical circuit troubleshooting tasks under different reporting conditions. The method of cued retrospective reporting used the original computer-based task and a superimposed record of the participant's eye fixations and mouse-keyboard operations as a cue for retrospection. Cued retrospective reporting (with the exception of why information) and concurrent reporting (with the exception of metacognitive information) resulted in a higher number of codes on the different types of information than did retrospective reporting.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 237-244 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | Journal of Experimental Psychology. Applied |
| Volume | 11 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Dec 2005 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Uncovering the problem-solving process: cued retrospective reporting versus concurrent and retrospective reporting.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver