Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Uncovering the problem-solving process: cued retrospective reporting versus concurrent and retrospective reporting.

  • Tamara van Gog*
  • , Fred Paas
  • , Jeroen J G van Merriënboer
  • , Puk Witte
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Open University of the Netherlands

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

This study investigated the amounts of problem-solving process information ("action," "why," "how," and "metacognitive") elicited by means of concurrent, retrospective, and cued retrospective reporting. In a within-participants design, 26 participants completed electrical circuit troubleshooting tasks under different reporting conditions. The method of cued retrospective reporting used the original computer-based task and a superimposed record of the participant's eye fixations and mouse-keyboard operations as a cue for retrospection. Cued retrospective reporting (with the exception of why information) and concurrent reporting (with the exception of metacognitive information) resulted in a higher number of codes on the different types of information than did retrospective reporting.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)237-244
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Experimental Psychology. Applied
Volume11
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2005

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Uncovering the problem-solving process: cued retrospective reporting versus concurrent and retrospective reporting.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this