TY - JOUR
T1 - Uncovering cognitive processes
T2 - Cued retrospective reporting based on eye-movement records
AU - Van Gog, Tamara
AU - Brand-Gruwel, Saskia
AU - Van Meeuwen, Ludo
AU - Paas, Fred
PY - 2008/12/1
Y1 - 2008/12/1
N2 - The verbal reporting techniques used most in research on learning and instruction, concurrent and retrospective reporting, both have drawbacks. Retrospective reporting often results in omissions/fabrications, and concurrent reporting is difficult to implement when tasks impose high cognitive load or contain auditory information. Cued retrospective reporting (CRR) based on eye-movement records might be able to overcome these drawbacks: while maintaining the retrospective nature, the cue shows both physical (mouse/keyboard) and cognitive (eye movements) actions, thereby presumably leading to less omissions/fabrications. Because a previous study showed promising results, the present study extends the test of CRR to qualitative data (i.e., process coverage).
AB - The verbal reporting techniques used most in research on learning and instruction, concurrent and retrospective reporting, both have drawbacks. Retrospective reporting often results in omissions/fabrications, and concurrent reporting is difficult to implement when tasks impose high cognitive load or contain auditory information. Cued retrospective reporting (CRR) based on eye-movement records might be able to overcome these drawbacks: while maintaining the retrospective nature, the cue shows both physical (mouse/keyboard) and cognitive (eye movements) actions, thereby presumably leading to less omissions/fabrications. Because a previous study showed promising results, the present study extends the test of CRR to qualitative data (i.e., process coverage).
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84880433684&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84880433684
SN - 1573-4552
SP - 416
EP - 417
JO - Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning
JF - Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning
IS - PART 3
ER -