Two sides of the working alliance: A qualitative study from the perspective of both probationers and probation officers

A. Sturm*, V. de Vogel, M.J.H. Huibers

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    Abstract

    The probationer–probation officer working alliance plays an important role in the outcome of probation supervision. This study explored the development of the working alliance between probationers and probation officers in the Netherlands, from the perspective of both probationers and probation officers. More specifically, we explored the significance of different aspects of the working alliance at the start of probation supervision and after a three-month period, as well as the role played by critical incidents during the supervisory process and their subsequent effect on the working alliance. Overall, the study showed that clarity over goals and restrictions was initially the most salient issue for both parties, and that after a three-month period the working alliance evolved into a trusting relationship. Several incidents were identified, probationers identified more positive moments and less negative moments than their PO counterparts. If these types of incidents are managed accordingly by the probation officer, then they can ultimately serve to strengthen the relationship.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)40-59
    JournalEuropean Journal of Probation
    Volume14
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2022

    Bibliographical note

    Publisher Copyright:
    © The Author(s) 2022.

    Keywords

    • critical incidents
    • probation supervision
    • qualitative research
    • working alliance

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Two sides of the working alliance: A qualitative study from the perspective of both probationers and probation officers'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this