TY - JOUR
T1 - Two sides of the working alliance
T2 - A qualitative study from the perspective of both probationers and probation officers
AU - Sturm, A.
AU - de Vogel, V.
AU - Huibers, M.J.H.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2022.
PY - 2022/4/1
Y1 - 2022/4/1
N2 - The probationer–probation officer working alliance plays an important role in the outcome of probation supervision. This study explored the development of the working alliance between probationers and probation officers in the Netherlands, from the perspective of both probationers and probation officers. More specifically, we explored the significance of different aspects of the working alliance at the start of probation supervision and after a three-month period, as well as the role played by critical incidents during the supervisory process and their subsequent effect on the working alliance. Overall, the study showed that clarity over goals and restrictions was initially the most salient issue for both parties, and that after a three-month period the working alliance evolved into a trusting relationship. Several incidents were identified, probationers identified more positive moments and less negative moments than their PO counterparts. If these types of incidents are managed accordingly by the probation officer, then they can ultimately serve to strengthen the relationship.
AB - The probationer–probation officer working alliance plays an important role in the outcome of probation supervision. This study explored the development of the working alliance between probationers and probation officers in the Netherlands, from the perspective of both probationers and probation officers. More specifically, we explored the significance of different aspects of the working alliance at the start of probation supervision and after a three-month period, as well as the role played by critical incidents during the supervisory process and their subsequent effect on the working alliance. Overall, the study showed that clarity over goals and restrictions was initially the most salient issue for both parties, and that after a three-month period the working alliance evolved into a trusting relationship. Several incidents were identified, probationers identified more positive moments and less negative moments than their PO counterparts. If these types of incidents are managed accordingly by the probation officer, then they can ultimately serve to strengthen the relationship.
KW - critical incidents
KW - probation supervision
KW - qualitative research
KW - working alliance
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85124071437&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/20662203211056486
DO - 10.1177/20662203211056486
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85124071437
SN - 2066-2203
VL - 14
SP - 40
EP - 59
JO - European Journal of Probation
JF - European Journal of Probation
IS - 1
ER -