@article{d67132d32ae343aeab5da1ab7c60f9e7,
title = "Two notes on Axiological Futurism: The importance of disagreement and methodological implications for value theory",
abstract = "Recently, John Danaher defended a research agenda he calls “Axiological Futurism”. In this commentary, I propose two revisions for how that research agenda is defined. I argue that it ought to focus on disagreements and comparison of different axiologies.",
keywords = "Axiological Futurism, Axiology, Disagreement, Value theory",
author = "Bj{\"o}rn Lundgren",
note = "Funding Information: This work is part of the research programme Ethics of Socially Disruptive Technologies, which is funded through the Gravitation programme of the Dutch Ministry of Education, Culture, and Science and the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO grant number 024.004.031 ). Funding Information: I'm grateful to comments from John Danaher, Sven Nyholm, and two reviewers. Any faults are mine alone. This work is part of the research programme Ethics of Socially Disruptive Technologies, which is funded through the Gravitation programme of the Dutch Ministry of Education, Culture, and Science and the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO grant number 024.004.031). Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2023 The Authors",
year = "2023",
month = mar,
doi = "10.1016/j.futures.2023.103120",
language = "English",
volume = "147",
journal = "Futures",
issn = "0016-3287",
publisher = "Elsevier Ltd",
}