Turkish University Students’ Perceptions of Their Lecturers’ Interpersonal Behaviour

  • Sibel Telli*
  • , Perry den Brok
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaperAcademic

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to adapt an existing instrument for measuring teacher interpersonal behaviour, the Questionnaire on Teacher Interaction (QTI), to the Turkish higher education context. The questionnaire maps behaviour in terms of two dimensions: Influence (dominance/submission) and Proximity (cooperation/opposition). These two dimensions structure interpersonal teacher behaviour into eight behavioural sectors or domains: leadership, helpful/friendly, understanding, freedom, uncertain, dissatisfied, admonishing behaviour and strictness. The instrument was constructed in two pilot rounds. A sample of 624 higher education students in 22 classes, together with their nine instructors, participated in the first round of the study; 250 students in 9 classes with their four instructors participated in the second round. Factor and consistency analyses supported reliability and validity of the instrument: Cronbach's alpha coefficients of the scales were mostly above .70. Variance analyses showed that the scales were able to distinguish between classes and lecturers. Factor analyses indicated that two dimensions could be found in the data and that scales
were ordered in terms of the hypothesized model. Turkish lecturers were perceived by their students as very cooperative and somewhat dominant. Thus, the instrument can be used for future research in Turkish higher education.
Original languageEnglish
Publication statusPublished - 2009
Externally publishedYes
EventEARLI 2009 - Amsterdam
Duration: 25 Aug 200929 Aug 2009

Conference

ConferenceEARLI 2009
CityAmsterdam
Period25/08/0929/08/09

Keywords

  • Higher education,
  • Professional Development,
  • Social Interaction in Learning and Instruction

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Turkish University Students’ Perceptions of Their Lecturers’ Interpersonal Behaviour'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this