Abstract
Background: Urban areas are unique ecosystems with stark differences in species abundance and composition compared with natural ecosystems. These differences can affect pathogen transmission dynamics, thereby altering zoonotic pathogen prevalence and diversity. In this study, we screened small mammals from natural and urban areas in the Netherlands for up to 19 zoonotic pathogens, including viruses, bacteria, and protozoan parasites. Materials and Methods: In total, 578 small mammals were captured, including wood mice ( Apodemus sylvaticus), bank voles ( Myodes glareolus), yellow-necked mice ( Apodemus flavicollis), house mice ( Mus musculus), common voles ( Microtus arvalis), and greater white-toothed shrews ( Crocidura russula). We detected a wide variety of zoonotic pathogens in small mammals from both urban and natural areas. For a subset of these pathogens, in wood mice and bank voles, we then tested whether pathogen prevalence and diversity were associated with habitat type ( i.e., natural versus urban), degree of greenness, and various host characteristics. Results: The prevalence of tick-borne zoonotic pathogens ( Borrelia spp. and Neoehrlichia mikurensis) was significantly higher in wood mice from natural areas. In contrast, the prevalence of Bartonella spp. was higher in wood mice from urban areas, but this difference was not statistically significant. Pathogen diversity was higher in bank voles from natural habitats and increased with body weight for both rodent species, although this relationship depended on sex for bank voles. In addition, we detected methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, extended-spectrum beta-lactamase/AmpC-producing Escherichia coli, and lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus for the first time in rodents in the Netherlands. Discussion: The differences between natural and urban areas are likely related to differences in the abundance and diversity of arthropod vectors and vertebrate community composition. With increasing environmental encroachment and changes in urban land use ( e.g., urban greening), it is important to better understand transmission dynamics of zoonotic pathogens in urban environments to reduce potential disease risks for public health.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 478-488 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| Journal | Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases |
| Volume | 24 |
| Issue number | 8 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Aug 2024 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.
Funding
This work was supported by funding from both the Dutch Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport, DZIF, TTU \u201CEmerging Infections,\u201D and the European Union\u2019s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation program for the DESIRE project under grant agreement no. 773830: One Health European Joint Program.
| Funders | Funder number |
|---|---|
| Deutsches Zentrum für Infektionsforschung | |
| Ministerie van Volksgezondheid, Welzijn en Sport | |
| Texas Tech University | |
| Horizon 2020 Framework Programme | 773830 |
| Horizon 2020 Framework Programme |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
-
SDG 15 Life on Land
Keywords
- disease ecology
- epidemiology
- public health
- richness
- rodents
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'T(r)icky Environments: Higher Prevalence of Tick-Borne Zoonotic Pathogens in Rodents from Natural Areas Compared with Urban Areas'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver