TY - JOUR
T1 - Transmission of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) during animal transport
AU - EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ)
AU - Koutsoumanis, Konstantinos
AU - Allende, Ana
AU - Álvarez-Ordóñez, Avelino
AU - Bolton, Declan
AU - Bover-Cid, Sara
AU - Chemaly, Marianne
AU - Davies, Robert
AU - De Cesare, Alessandra
AU - Herman, Lieve
AU - Hilbert, Friederike
AU - Lindqvist, Roland
AU - Nauta, Maarten
AU - Ru, Giuseppe
AU - Simmons, Marion
AU - Skandamis, Panagiotis
AU - Suffredini, Elisabetta
AU - Argüello-Rodríguez, Héctor
AU - Dohmen, Wietske
AU - Magistrali, Chiara Francesca
AU - Padalino, Barbara
AU - Tenhagen, Bernd-Alois
AU - Threlfall, John
AU - García-Fierro, Raquel
AU - Guerra, Beatriz
AU - Liébana, Ernesto
AU - Stella, Pietro
AU - Peixe, Luisa
N1 - © 2022 Wiley‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KgaA on behalf of the European Food Safety Authority.
PY - 2022/10/25
Y1 - 2022/10/25
N2 - The transmission of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) between food-producing animals (poultry, cattle and pigs) during short journeys (< 8 h) and long journeys (> 8 h) directed to other farms or to the slaughterhouse lairage (directly or with intermediate stops at assembly centres or control posts, mainly transported by road) was assessed. Among the identified risk factors contributing to the probability of transmission of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria (ARB) and antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs), the ones considered more important are the resistance status (presence of ARB/ARGs) of the animals pre-transport, increased faecal shedding, hygiene of the areas and vehicles, exposure to other animals carrying and/or shedding ARB/ARGs (especially between animals of different AMR loads and/or ARB/ARG types), exposure to contaminated lairage areas and duration of transport. There are nevertheless no data whereby differences between journeys shorter or longer than 8 h can be assessed. Strategies that would reduce the probability of AMR transmission, for all animal categories include minimising the duration of transport, proper cleaning and disinfection, appropriate transport planning, organising the transport in relation to AMR criteria (transport logistics), improving animal health and welfare and/or biosecurity immediately prior to and during transport, ensuring the thermal comfort of the animals and animal segregation. Most of the aforementioned measures have similar validity if applied at lairage, assembly centres and control posts. Data gaps relating to the risk factors and the effectiveness of mitigation measures have been identified, with consequent research needs in both the short and longer term listed. Quantification of the impact of animal transportation compared to the contribution of other stages of the food-production chain, and the interplay of duration with all risk factors on the transmission of ARB/ARGs during transport and journey breaks, were identified as urgent research needs.
AB - The transmission of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) between food-producing animals (poultry, cattle and pigs) during short journeys (< 8 h) and long journeys (> 8 h) directed to other farms or to the slaughterhouse lairage (directly or with intermediate stops at assembly centres or control posts, mainly transported by road) was assessed. Among the identified risk factors contributing to the probability of transmission of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria (ARB) and antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs), the ones considered more important are the resistance status (presence of ARB/ARGs) of the animals pre-transport, increased faecal shedding, hygiene of the areas and vehicles, exposure to other animals carrying and/or shedding ARB/ARGs (especially between animals of different AMR loads and/or ARB/ARG types), exposure to contaminated lairage areas and duration of transport. There are nevertheless no data whereby differences between journeys shorter or longer than 8 h can be assessed. Strategies that would reduce the probability of AMR transmission, for all animal categories include minimising the duration of transport, proper cleaning and disinfection, appropriate transport planning, organising the transport in relation to AMR criteria (transport logistics), improving animal health and welfare and/or biosecurity immediately prior to and during transport, ensuring the thermal comfort of the animals and animal segregation. Most of the aforementioned measures have similar validity if applied at lairage, assembly centres and control posts. Data gaps relating to the risk factors and the effectiveness of mitigation measures have been identified, with consequent research needs in both the short and longer term listed. Quantification of the impact of animal transportation compared to the contribution of other stages of the food-production chain, and the interplay of duration with all risk factors on the transmission of ARB/ARGs during transport and journey breaks, were identified as urgent research needs.
KW - antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs)
KW - antimicrobial-resistant bacteria (ARB)
KW - data gaps
KW - food-producing animals
KW - lairage
KW - mitigation options
KW - research needs
KW - risk factors
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85141663469
U2 - 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7586
DO - 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7586
M3 - Article
C2 - 36304831
SN - 1831-4732
VL - 20
JO - EFSA Journal
JF - EFSA Journal
IS - 10
M1 - e07586
ER -