Towards a Human Right to Psychological Continuity? Reflections on the Rights to Personal Identity, Self-Determination, and Personal Integrity

Sjors Ligthart*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Scholars from different disciplines are increasingly debating how human rights should protect the autonomy not only over our bodies but also over our minds. These debates are often driven by emerging technologies that appear able to access, monitor, and manipulate mental states in ways that were previously inconceivable. Whereas some human rights already protect certain personal interests in the mental realm, such as the right to freedom of thought, it has been argued that new or updated human rights are necessary to offer adequate protection against modern technologies that may threaten our mental privacy, personal integrity, and identity. One of the proposed rights, which is under consideration by the Council of Europe and the UN Human Rights Council, concerns a right to ‘psychological continuity’. This paper challenges the necessity of recognising such a right, arguing that the notion of psychological continuity already receives considerable protection within the established framework of human rights law.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)199-229
Number of pages31
JournalEuropean Convention on Human Rights Law Review
Volume5
Issue number2
Early online date11 Apr 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 11 Apr 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Brill Academic Publishers. All rights reserved.

Funding

This paper is funded by the Dutch Research Council (VI.C.201.067) .

FundersFunder number
Dutch Research CouncilVI.C.201.067

    Keywords

    • bodily
    • mental integrity
    • neurorights
    • personal identity
    • psychological continuity

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Towards a Human Right to Psychological Continuity? Reflections on the Rights to Personal Identity, Self-Determination, and Personal Integrity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this