Abstract
Scholars from different disciplines are increasingly debating how human rights should protect the autonomy not only over our bodies but also over our minds. These debates are often driven by emerging technologies that appear able to access, monitor, and manipulate mental states in ways that were previously inconceivable. Whereas some human rights already protect certain personal interests in the mental realm, such as the right to freedom of thought, it has been argued that new or updated human rights are necessary to offer adequate protection against modern technologies that may threaten our mental privacy, personal integrity, and identity. One of the proposed rights, which is under consideration by the Council of Europe and the UN Human Rights Council, concerns a right to ‘psychological continuity’. This paper challenges the necessity of recognising such a right, arguing that the notion of psychological continuity already receives considerable protection within the established framework of human rights law.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 199-229 |
Number of pages | 31 |
Journal | European Convention on Human Rights Law Review |
Volume | 5 |
Issue number | 2 |
Early online date | 11 Apr 2024 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 11 Apr 2024 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2024 Brill Academic Publishers. All rights reserved.
Funding
This paper is funded by the Dutch Research Council (VI.C.201.067) .
Funders | Funder number |
---|---|
Dutch Research Council | VI.C.201.067 |
Keywords
- bodily
- mental integrity
- neurorights
- personal identity
- psychological continuity