Tolerance, aesthetics, amenities or jobs? Dutch city attraction to the creative class

G.A. Marlet, C. van Woerkens

Research output: Working paperAcademic

Abstract

Richard Florida stated that it is not (only) job opportunities or urban amenities which attract creative high-educated people to cities but, rather, tolerance and aesthetics. We have tested this hypothesis in a cross section of Dutch cities. Our conclusion is that the tolerance/creative class nexus empirically fails to materialize for the Netherlands. However, the aesthetic assets of cities do provide a strong explanation for both share and growth of the creative class in Dutch cities. Beside that, job opportunities and urban amenities are still the most important factors influencing the choice for a place of residence.
Original languageEnglish
Place of PublicationUtrecht
PublisherUU USE Tjalling C. Koopmans Research Institute
Number of pages34
Publication statusPublished - 2005

Publication series

Name Discussion Paper Series / Tjalling C. Koopmans Research Institute
No.33
Volume05
ISSN (Electronic)2666-8238

Keywords

  • urban economics
  • human capital
  • creative class
  • tolerance
  • urban amenities
  • city aesthetics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Tolerance, aesthetics, amenities or jobs? Dutch city attraction to the creative class'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this