TY - JOUR
T1 - To Stop or Not to Stop, That's the Question
T2 - About Persistence and Mood of Workaholics and Work Engaged Employees
AU - Van Wijhe, Corine I.
AU - Peeters, Maria C. W.
AU - Schaufeli, Wilmar B.
PY - 2011/12
Y1 - 2011/12
N2 - Although workaholics and work engaged employees both work long hours, they seem to have a different underlying motivation to do so. The mood as input model might offer an explanation for the difference in work persistence of these employees. This model suggests that the interplay of mood and "persistence rules" (enough and enjoyment rules) may lead to different kinds of persistence mechanisms.The aims of this study are to present a scale for measuring persistence rules, the Work Persistence rules Checklist (WoPeC), to analyze its psychometric properties and to test the mood as input model in relationship with workaholism and work engagement.Structural equation modeling was used to analyze the data.Results of a confirmatory factor analysis in study 1 provided support for the hypothesized factor structure of the WoPeC. In study 2, it appeared that the use of an enough and an enjoyment rule for determining when to continue working is related to workaholism and work engagement, respectively. Furthermore, it was hypothesized and found that negative mood is related to workaholism, whereas positive mood is associated with work engagement. The expected interactions between mood and persistence rules on workaholism and work engagement were not demonstrated.Mood and persistence rules seem relevant for explaining the difference between workaholism and work engagement.
AB - Although workaholics and work engaged employees both work long hours, they seem to have a different underlying motivation to do so. The mood as input model might offer an explanation for the difference in work persistence of these employees. This model suggests that the interplay of mood and "persistence rules" (enough and enjoyment rules) may lead to different kinds of persistence mechanisms.The aims of this study are to present a scale for measuring persistence rules, the Work Persistence rules Checklist (WoPeC), to analyze its psychometric properties and to test the mood as input model in relationship with workaholism and work engagement.Structural equation modeling was used to analyze the data.Results of a confirmatory factor analysis in study 1 provided support for the hypothesized factor structure of the WoPeC. In study 2, it appeared that the use of an enough and an enjoyment rule for determining when to continue working is related to workaholism and work engagement, respectively. Furthermore, it was hypothesized and found that negative mood is related to workaholism, whereas positive mood is associated with work engagement. The expected interactions between mood and persistence rules on workaholism and work engagement were not demonstrated.Mood and persistence rules seem relevant for explaining the difference between workaholism and work engagement.
KW - Mood
KW - Persistence rules
KW - Work engagement
KW - Workaholism
UR - https://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=d7dz6a2i7wiom976oc9ff2iqvdhv8k5x&SrcAuth=WosAPI&KeyUT=WOS:000296884100012&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=WOS
U2 - 10.1007/s12529-011-9143-z
DO - 10.1007/s12529-011-9143-z
M3 - Article
C2 - 21373772
SN - 1070-5503
VL - 18
SP - 361
EP - 372
JO - International Journal of Behavioral Medicine
JF - International Journal of Behavioral Medicine
IS - 4
ER -