Abstract
Comedians are often celebrated for critically confronting their audiences, thereby upsetting deep-held beliefs of spectators and contributing to progressive change. In this article, I will use Dutch comedy as my case study to demonstrate that comedians’ playful opposition to the audience has serious political implications and reveals a deep suspicion towards political community. By analysing this fear of the community, this article contributes to a better understanding of the politics of comedy and challenges the dominant idea that critical comedy is inherently progressive and emancipatory. I point to the separate ways in which two Dutch comedians from different generations – Freek de Jonge and Micha Wertheim – use humour to unmask the audience as proto-fascist mass.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 422-437 |
| Number of pages | 16 |
| Journal | European Journal of Cultural Studies |
| Volume | 25 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Apr 2022 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship and/or publication of this article.
Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2022.
Keywords
- Comedy
- critical humour
- Freek de Jonge
- Micha Wertheim
- political community
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of ''Those who laugh as a body today, will march as a body tomorrow': Critical comedy and the politics of community'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver