The Vicious Cycle of Economic Inequality: The Role of Ideology in Shaping the Relationship Between “What Is” and “What Ought to Be” in 41 Countries

Efraín García-Sánchez, Jojanneke Van der Toorn, Rosa Rodríguez-Bailón, Guillermo B. Willis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

People’s desired levels of inequality are informed by the levels of inequality they perceive to exist. Perceived economic inequality is used as a reference point in determining people’s ideal level of inequality. However, recent research has suggested that the strength of this relationship depends on people’s endorsement of system-justifying beliefs. The current article extends this body of research by replicating these findings across 41 countries (N = 42,078), showing the impact of system-justifying beliefs at both the individual and the societal levels. We conducted a multilevel analysis and found that the higher the endorsement of equality of opportunity beliefs—both at the individual and the societal levels—and meritocratic beliefs—at the individual level—the stronger the relationship between perceived and ideal economic inequality. These findings are in support of a motivated account of the perceived legitimacy of economic inequality.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)991-1001
Number of pages11
JournalSocial Psychological and Personality Science
Volume10
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2019

Keywords

  • economic inequality
  • legitimacy
  • perceptions of inequality
  • societal beliefs
  • system justifying beliefs

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Vicious Cycle of Economic Inequality: The Role of Ideology in Shaping the Relationship Between “What Is” and “What Ought to Be” in 41 Countries'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this