Abstract
Cities are increasingly encouraged to adopt cross-sector coordination mechanisms and visions as a response to complex urban sustainability challenges. However, infrastructure governance remains highly fragmented, with limited understanding of how and why coordination emerges, what issues it prioritises and whether these selective forms effectively address or obscure deeper structural challenges. This article investigates the dynamics of cross-sector coordination by examining water and energy governance in Cape Town, Los Angeles and Maputo – three cities with distinct governance structures and capacities yet facing similar socio-ecological pressures. It argues that rather than an absence of coordination, cities experience a proliferation of diverse, often selective and sometimes conflicting coordination efforts, each shaped by specific institutional, political and strategic imperatives.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1919-1938 |
Journal | Urban Studies |
Volume | 62 |
Issue number | 9 |
Early online date | 2025 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Jul 2025 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© Urban Studies Journal Limited 2025.
Funding
The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This publication is partly supported by the Pathways to Sustainability research theme at Utrecht University. This publication is also part of the project Nexusing Water, Energy and Food to Increase Resilience in the Cape Town Metropolitan Region (project number 482.19.112) of the research programme the Merian Fund, which is (partly) financed by the Dutch Research Council (NWO).
Funders | Funder number |
---|---|
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek | |
Universiteit Utrecht | 482.19.112 |
Keywords
- coordination
- energy
- governance
- infrastructure
- water