The triple-deficit hypothesis in Arabic: Evidence from children with and without dyslexia

Smail Layes*, Marjolaine Cohen, Sietske van Viersen

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

This study investigated the triple-deficit hypothesis in Arabic, a Semitic transparent orthography, among 258 native Arabic children from Grade 3, divided into a typical readers group (n = 204) and a dyslexia group (n = 54). Children were tested on word- and pseudoword-reading accuracy, word-reading fluency, phonological awareness (PA), naming speed (NS), orthographic processing (OP), and nonverbal reasoning ability. The results indicated that all children with dyslexia had either double or triple deficits, and none of them had a single deficit. Children with triple deficits showed lower performance than children with single and no deficits on all the reading measures. They have also lower performance to children with double deficits on word-reading accuracy but comparable scores in word- and pseudoword-reading fluency. In addition, OP was confirmed as an additional independent predictor of word-level reading skills besides PA and NS, while controlling for age and nonverbal intelligence. The classification findings showed that the presence of a triple deficit maximizes the risk of reading failure. These findings support the additive nature of combined deficits in PA, NS, and OP. Moreover, they establish the benefit of including OP as a third deficit, in addition to PA and NS, underlying dyslexia in Arabic.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1165-1192
Number of pages28
JournalApplied Psycholinguistics
Volume43
Issue number5
Early online date2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2022

Keywords

  • Arabic orthography
  • naming speed
  • orthographic processing
  • phonological awareness
  • triple-deficit hypothesis
  • word reading

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The triple-deficit hypothesis in Arabic: Evidence from children with and without dyslexia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this