Abstract
Transhumanists advocate humankind’s transcendence of biological barriers to well-being. To achieve this they propose extensive development and use of enhancement technologies to improve the flawed human condition. A central goal of transhumanism, which I will refer to as the ‘transhumanist prospect’, is radical enhancement of human lifespans and control over the aging process. In this primarily descriptive contribution, I outline the transhumanist prospect and discuss philosophical and ethical debates about the transhumanist stance on aging. In doing so, I point to controversial premises in transhumanist thinking and provide what I regard as useful distinctions. In particular, I distinguish between different understandings of transhumanism and suggest being in favour of enhancement is not equivalent to being a transhumanist. Thereafter, I characterise three transhumanist ends that converge with respect to aging: freedom and self-control, making individuals better than well, and surmounting the limitations of human nature. Transhumanists advocate intervening in or escaping the aging process, and I differentiate between five modes whereby this may be achieved. Finally, I examine several types of ethical objections related to the transhumanist prospect.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | The Palgrave Handbook of the Philosophy of Aging |
| Pages | 517-538 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2017 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The transhumanist prospect: Developing technology to extend the human lifespan'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver