TY - CHAP
T1 - The transhumanist prospect
T2 - Developing technology to extend the human lifespan
AU - Wareham, C.
PY - 2017
Y1 - 2017
N2 - Transhumanists advocate humankind’s transcendence of biological barriers to well-being. To achieve this they propose extensive development and use of enhancement technologies to improve the flawed human condition. A central goal of transhumanism, which I will refer to as the ‘transhumanist prospect’, is radical enhancement of human lifespans and control over the aging process. In this primarily descriptive contribution, I outline the transhumanist prospect and discuss philosophical and ethical debates about the transhumanist stance on aging. In doing so, I point to controversial premises in transhumanist thinking and provide what I regard as useful distinctions. In particular, I distinguish between different understandings of transhumanism and suggest being in favour of enhancement is not equivalent to being a transhumanist. Thereafter, I characterise three transhumanist ends that converge with respect to aging: freedom and self-control, making individuals better than well, and surmounting the limitations of human nature. Transhumanists advocate intervening in or escaping the aging process, and I differentiate between five modes whereby this may be achieved. Finally, I examine several types of ethical objections related to the transhumanist prospect.
AB - Transhumanists advocate humankind’s transcendence of biological barriers to well-being. To achieve this they propose extensive development and use of enhancement technologies to improve the flawed human condition. A central goal of transhumanism, which I will refer to as the ‘transhumanist prospect’, is radical enhancement of human lifespans and control over the aging process. In this primarily descriptive contribution, I outline the transhumanist prospect and discuss philosophical and ethical debates about the transhumanist stance on aging. In doing so, I point to controversial premises in transhumanist thinking and provide what I regard as useful distinctions. In particular, I distinguish between different understandings of transhumanism and suggest being in favour of enhancement is not equivalent to being a transhumanist. Thereafter, I characterise three transhumanist ends that converge with respect to aging: freedom and self-control, making individuals better than well, and surmounting the limitations of human nature. Transhumanists advocate intervening in or escaping the aging process, and I differentiate between five modes whereby this may be achieved. Finally, I examine several types of ethical objections related to the transhumanist prospect.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-85019547561&partnerID=MN8TOARS
U2 - 10.1057/978-1-137-39356-2_28
DO - 10.1057/978-1-137-39356-2_28
M3 - Chapter
SN - 9781137393562
SN - 9781137393555
SP - 517
EP - 538
BT - The Palgrave Handbook of the Philosophy of Aging
ER -