Abstract
In crisis times, political leaders face not only agonizing policy choices in uncertain circumstances but also delicate accountability issues and blame games. This chapter highlights the rather sophisticated nature of this blame-management work in the context of COVID-19. It disentangles the Dutch crisis-management discourse based on a qualitative analysis of government press conferences. It specifically zooms in on the interaction between journalists and officeholders in situations where the question of blame is made manifest. It identifies a picture of Dutch blame discourse that is more complex than current studies have revealed. Instead of overt blame-shifting to experts, local government bodies, companies, or citizens, the chapter uncovers two subtler discursive strategies: (1) emphasizing the inevitable uncertainties and risks behind policy decisions made and (2) questioning the appropriateness of playing blame games. Both strategies underscore the important role of ambiguity in how blame is managed in hard times.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | The Politics and Governance of Blame |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press |
| Chapter | 15 |
| Pages | 399-416 |
| Number of pages | 18 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9780191998225 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9780198896388 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 9 Jul 2024 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© Joram Feitsma and Thomas Schillemans (2024).
Keywords
- Ambiguity
- Blame discourse
- Blame games
- COVID-19
- Crisis management
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The Subtle Art of Not Pointing the Finger'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver