The Student View on Online Peer Review

Christine Bauer, Kathrin Figl, Michael Derntl, Peter Paul Beran, Sonja Kabicher

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaperAcademic


Peer review is used as an effective quality assurance measure in many contexts, including science, business, programming or education. In education, several studies confirmed the positive effects of peer reviewing on student learning. Based on recent research concerning the role of media in the peer review process this study investigates how students perceive the process, content and effects of peer reviews. We also analyze students’ opinions on different modes of peer reviewing activities, e.g. online vs. face-to-face reviewing. In the context of a computer science course on scientific writing, these research questions were addressed by administering an online questionnaire (n=38) and analysis using quantitative and qualitative methods. Results indicate that students value the peer review activity, take peer reviews seriously and provide comprehensive and constructive reviews. Findings also show that students prefer written online reviews with the possibility of oral follow-up questions to reviewers.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages5
Publication statusPublished - 2009
Event14th Annual ACM-SIGCSE Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education - Paris, France
Duration: 6 Jun 20148 Jul 2014
Conference number: 14


Conference14th Annual ACM-SIGCSE Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education
Abbreviated titleSIGCSE 2009


  • Peer review; Peer assessment; Online assessment; Communication


Dive into the research topics of 'The Student View on Online Peer Review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this