Abstract
The catalogue by Johannes Hevelius with the positions and magnitudes of 1564 entries was published by his wife Elisabeth Koopman in 1690. We provide a machine-readable version of the catalogue, and briefly discuss its accuracy on the basis of comparison with data from the modern Hipparcos Catalogue. We compare our results with an earlier analysis by Rybka (1984), finding good overall agreement. The magnitudes given by Hevelius correlate well with modern values. The accuracy of his position measurements is similar to that of Brahe, with sigma = 2 ' for longitudes and latitudes, but with more errors >5 ' than expected for a Gaussian distribution. The position accuracy decreases slowly with magnitude. The fraction of stars with position errors larger than a degree is 1.5%, rather smaller than the fraction of 5% in the star catalogue of Brahe.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 29 |
| Pages (from-to) | A29/1-A29/22 |
| Number of pages | 22 |
| Journal | Astronomy and Astrophysics |
| Volume | 516 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2010 |
Keywords
- astrometry
- history and philosophy of astronomy